The moral equivalence being practised by the International Criminal Court is sickening and preposterous.
This decision lacks a basis in law and completely undermines the seriousness and credibility of the International Criminal Court.
Hamas, a terrorist organisation, planned and executed one of the most horrific war crimes of this century, intentionally targeting civilians, taking hostages, and engaging in the most barbaric acts of cruelty.
Israel’s democratically elected leaders have exercised their right to self defence, a right that any nation in similar circumstances would enjoy, and has sought to minimise civilian casualties as it seeks to defeat Hamas and recover its hostages.
To equate the two is grotesque. It erases the moral distinction between aggressor and victim, and de facto abolishes the right to self defence.
May 21, 2024
The moral equivalence being practised by the International Criminal Court is sickening and preposterous.
This decision lacks a basis in law and completely undermines the seriousness and credibility of the International Criminal Court.
Hamas, a terrorist organisation, planned and executed one of the most horrific war crimes of this century, intentionally targeting civilians, taking hostages, and engaging in the most barbaric acts of cruelty.
Israel’s democratically elected leaders have exercised their right to self defence, a right that any nation in similar circumstances would enjoy, and has sought to minimise civilian casualties as it seeks to defeat Hamas and recover its hostages.
To equate the two is grotesque. It erases the moral distinction between aggressor and victim, and de facto abolishes the right to self defence.